Informal Logic Victor Reppert December 15, The Death Penalty 2 Many Americans feel that if an offender is convicted of committing a capital crime that the offender should be automatically sentenced to death. While the prisons do serve the purpose of housing inmates who have broken the law there is the question as to why there are so many minorities sentenced to death within the United States prisons than non- whites. The Innocence Project was founded in by Barry C.
Is the Death Penalty Applied Fairly? Essay Capital punishment has been used around the world for many thousands of years as a way of enforcing justice when someone has done wrong by what standards that the cultures have - Is the Death Penalty Applied Fairly?
Over the past few centuries capital punishment has started to be questioned by many people in Europe and in the United States. Many people who support the death penalty cite reasons such as deterrence and not wanting to spend money a person who will never be a productive member of society again.
Many who are in opposition to the death penalty say that the death penalty is killing innocent people and is actually not saving any money at all and that it is in fact costing too much and that it is wrong to simply kill someone who commits a crime.
There are also questions to the fairness of the death penalty and many who question if it is being applied fairly. Both sides of the debate over the morality and legitimacy of capital punishment will be presented in this paper with this author taking one side.
The cost of the death penalty is reason that many people use as a reason to not use capital punishment but not many people ask why it is so high.
The actual cost of the death penalty varies state by state but it averages out to 1. This is a staggering cost when you compare it to taking care of an inmate for life, which has a median cost ofdollars Zimmerman, But the question is why is the cost so high.
Inthe Supreme Court began imposing various exclusionary rules for confessions and search-and-seizure and creating the lengthy appeals process William, The trial costs and processes would always require money but nowhere near the costs due to legal fees thanks to the Supreme Court.
The solutions are easy and they involve the shortening of the appeal process and some other minor things that cost a lot of money. Many people who oppose the death penalty will be quick to point to the people who are innocent but still convicted.
The first rebuttal to this is that first and foremost understanding that no system is completely foolproof. After accepting that innocent people are wrongly convicted, the next logical question is how often this is this happening and why is this happening.
To start off, the death penalty is not normally sought unless the crime is egregious. Since there have been cases were people who were convicted and given a sentence of death who were later exonerated Keil, This is deeply troubling until you see the amount of convictions that have happened since However, there will always be inaccuracy with any system such as eyewitnesses being wrong, perjury, and having a poor defense.
In the end, the number of mistakes that happen are minimal and vast majority of the child rapist and killers will get a punishment that fits their crimes. Those who support the death penalty cite that the use of capital punishment deters others from committing their horrible crimes.
There actually has been some statistical numbers which do in fact support this.
Inafter the Supreme Court had declared Capital Punishment unconstitutional the number of homicides began to increase to numbers not seen since Zimmerman, Homicide rates peaked in, and Zimmerman, The Supreme Court did legalize capital punishment in but some believe that it took time for people to realize what their crimes could do to them William, As much as these numbers help support the deterrent theory, this author considers them a weak argument that does not tell the whole story.
Many believe that most people do not always think about the punishment prior to actually committing their crimes. These are called crimes of passion and they happen when people do not think about the consequences of their actions. There is also sociological data that shows crimes in relation to population age and unwanted pregnancies Zimmerman, What has been learned is that we do not fully know how effective of a deterrence the death penalty has on society.Forty-nine percent now say the death penalty is applied fairly and 45% say it is applied unfairly.
The 49% who say the death penalty is applied fairly is, by one percentage point, the lowest Gallup has measured since it first asked the question in and reflects a gradual decline of this view over the past decade.
The Death Penalty (Opposing Viewpoints Series) [Diane Andrews Henningfeld] on barnweddingvt.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Presents a collection of essays exploring varying viewpoints on capital punishment, discussing such topics as whether the death penalty is applied fairlyReviews: 1.
The court ruled that the death penalty, as applied in most states, was unconstitutionally arbitrary and discriminatory. The ruling effectively suspended the death penalty by overturning state laws.
DEATH PENALTY 3 Is the Death Penalty Just and Applied Fairly?
The subject of capital punishment causes a vast array of emotions to surface when opinions are elicited from citizens of the United States. The death penalty has an exhaustive list of pros and cons, including major issues such as how humane the consequence actually is and the financial costs associated with carrying out the punishment.
Fewer than half of Americans now believe the death penalty is fairly applied in the United States, according to the annual Gallup crime poll of U.S. adults, conducted October Across four chapters, readers will evaluate whether the death penalty is just and ethical, whether it serves the public good, whether it is applied fairly, and if .