So I answered them and here they are. Keep in mind though, I never actually read the book. So if you find any errors, comment, and I will fix it. Take these answers as you want, right or wrong I have no idea, I only ask that people from this year use them as a reference and change up the answers rather than copy paste the whole bit.
Salinger, who died in January ofis now poised to make a posthumous literary comeback. A probing biography released earlier this year sheds new light on the enigmatic author, whose life has been largely shrouded in mystery.
After catapulting to fame in the s, Salinger famously decided to retreat from public life. For nearly five decades, he lived as a New England recluse, closely guarding his privacy, shunning the spotlight of fame, and publishing no new material after His fans wondered whether he had given up on writing altogether.
Now we know that he never gave up; he was writing new material all the time during his long silence. As many as five new books will be published during the next few years. For personal reasons, Salinger stipulated that none of this work be published until after his death.
By far the strangest aspect of his career is the way in which his most successful work, The Catcher in the Ryewas linked to several notorious crimes in the s: Caught up in a desperate whirl of mass media frenzy, The Catcher in the Rye — a book which is wholly unconcerned with criminal activity — came to be seen as a dangerous, malevolent work.
Rather, he had written a book which inspired people to commit crimes. As ridiculous as this seems, the insinuation has stuck. This is now simply part of the Salinger mystique, stubbornly attached to the legacy of his best novel.
The reality and the mystique are both explored in the biography Salinger, compiled by David Shields and Shane Salerno. A fascinating read, this volume should keep fans and critics and armchair psychologists busy for quite some time.
We learn that his development as a writer was a painstaking process, aided in part by a creative writing class at Columbia, with only gradual acceptance from the editors at The New Yorker.
We discover that throughout much of his life he was drawn to the company of younger women, often teenage girls not yet on the cusp of adulthood. He befriended them, mentored them, and even romanced them in his own way. There are no accusations of statutory rape — he apparently waited until the girls were 18 before he seduced any of them — but still the tendency is notable.
We understand that one way he coped was to withdraw from public life, taking up the study and practice of Vedanta Buddhism, rather than pursuing further wealth and fame and adulation.
We learn that the reason he stopped publishing was to forgo the ego gratification involved. Well before it became tainted by murder, The Catcher is the Rye was viewed as a controversial classic of post-war American fiction, a quintessential portrait of adolescent angst. Since it was first published inmillions have read it and debated its merits.
School boards have tried to ban it. Moral proselytizers have attacked it. In hindsight, one struggles to understand what all the fuss was about. How could this compelling novel, filled with so much emotional insight and self-deprecating humor, ever be considered subversive or dangerous?
No one denies it is an edgy work, conveyed in razor-sharp language. Yet compared to other books from roughly the same time period — the fever dreams of William Faulkner, the sociopolitical outrage of Richard Wright, or the ruthless amorality depicted by noir writers such as James M.
But Holden never comes close to killing anybody. He never even harms anyone. We might argue that the novel could use a bit of crime, just to liven up the action.
Perhaps one of the yet-to-be-published Salinger books will be a sequel, in which Holden returns as a truly dangerous psycho. I seriously doubt it, though. The story opens as Holden, a 16 year-old student, has just been expelled from prep school.
He ducks into bars, dances with girls, checks into a seedy hotel, pays for a prostitute with whom he just wants to talk. He gets very drunk. He visits former teachers and hangs out with his younger sister, Phoebe.
Through all of this, he delivers a stunning informal commentary — a profanity-laced monologue that is closer to Lenny Bruce than to Charles Dickens.The Catcher in the Rye () was J.
Salinger’s ﬁrst—and only— published novel. It is about a passionate, confused, and sometimes insufferably negative young man named Holden Caulﬁeld. Below are various excerpts from the novel, followed by a clip from South Park that begs the question, why was this book ever banned?
All quotes provided below may be cited as J. D. Salinger, The. Anyone who has read J.D. Salinger's New Yorker stories, particularly A Perfect Day for Bananafish, Uncle Wiggily in Connecticut, The Laughing Man, and For Esme--With Love and Squalor, will not be surprised by the fact that his first novel is full of children.
The hero-narrator of THE CATCHER IN THE RYE is an ancient child of sixteen, a native New Yorker named Holden Caulfield. The Catcher in the Rye - The Catcher in the Rye is a novel by J.D. Salinger. It is narrated by Holden Caulfield, a cynical teenager who recently got expelled from his fourth school.
Jan 28, · "The Catcher in the Rye," with its immortal teenage protagonist, the twisted, rebellious Holden Caulfield, came out in , a time of anxious, Cold War conformity and the dawn of . About Dead Caulfields Dead Caulfields was established in as an online resource focused on the life and works of J.D.
Salinger. The site's exploration covers not only Salinger's classic novel The Catcher in the Rye, but also the author's lesser-known writings, published and unpublished. Catcher in the Rye and Dead Poetry Society Compression Essay Words | 3 Pages Catcher In The Rye and Dead Poets Society Essay Sometimes in literature, two different forms of writing tell two different stories with lots of similarities through characters.